Creative & Visual Media
Heather Cooper (@HBCoop_) demonstrated advancements in generative video models by transforming a Midjourney image into a Veo 3.1 video clip. The prompt specified a woman in low-key lighting exhaling and tucking hair behind her ear, with precise control over motion and a still camera.
Midjourney -> Veo 3.1
Prompt:
A woman in a dark red top stands in a dimly lit room, illuminated by a single warm light source from the right. She exhales slowly, her shoulders dropping slightly, then reaches up with one hand to tuck a strand of dark hair behind her ear. Her… pic.twitter.com/Gbw12xGnzh— Heather Cooper (@HBCoop_) March 7, 2026
Omar Sar noted rapid improvements in AI long-form video generation after gaining early access to Utopai Studios’ new PAI model, praising its capabilities and editing tools.
AI long-form video generation is rapidly improving.
I got early access to @UtopaiStudios new PAI model, and it has blown my mind about what's possible.
I really like their editing tools. Will continue to test this out and share more fun examples. pic.twitter.com/Vw3wdXMwPh
— elvis (@omarsar0) March 7, 2026
Justine Moore (@venturetwins) highlighted major advances in Kling’s new Motion Control feature for generative video, particularly its impressive character swap capabilities. She shared a video demo using “known” faces (hard mode for consistency), noting it handled tricky shots with multiple angles well, improving facial consistency across cuts and reducing warping—especially with face-locking.
The new Kling Motion Control is insanely good at character swap.
I used "known" faces, which is hard mode – we're much better at judging if they stay consistent throughout the clip.
It's not perfect, but it handled a tricky shot with multiple weird angles quite well 👇 pic.twitter.com/lu0QTJTWpn
— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) March 7, 2026
GPT 5.4 is a really special model.
I think the tweet below is about coding, but IMO it also holds for general use (like explaining concepts or talking through issues).
It’s tough to get the personality right – this model genuinely feels like talking to a smart friend. https://t.co/xcIk5MsqtB
— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) March 7, 2026
Software Development
Alex Volkov (@altryne) highlighted AI-assisted coding workflows using Codex on Windows, integrated with Raycast and GPT 5.4 native sandboxes. He described building three projects simultaneously on a 115″ projector screen, calling it “ridiculously overpowered.”
I have a gaming/media PC that's connected to a 115" proj. screen in my basement (goals right?) and I've never used it for any coding!
With Codex on Windows (and @raycast on win!) I am … building 3 projects at the same fucking time on this huge screen mwahaha while my kids are… pic.twitter.com/ZHhmYbkWZZ
— Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) (@altryne) March 7, 2026
Jonathan Fischoff suggested that Cursor should focus on aggregating intelligence from multiple models rather than developing its own foundational model like Opus or GPT, leveraging its position in AI-assisted coding.
imo cursor should not build its own model, or at least it should not build the same kind of model as Opus, GPT etc.
Someone should be aggregate the intelligence of all the models, and Cursor is well positioned to do that
— Jonathan Fischoff (@jfischoff) March 7, 2026
GPT 5.4 emerged as a standout model, praised by Justine Moore (@venturetwins) for its coding prowess and general utility, feeling like conversing with a “smart friend” for explaining concepts or troubleshooting.
GPT 5.4 is a really special model.
I think the tweet below is about coding, but IMO it also holds for general use (like explaining concepts or talking through issues).
It’s tough to get the personality right – this model genuinely feels like talking to a smart friend. https://t.co/xcIk5MsqtB
— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) March 7, 2026
Ethan Mollick (@emollick) noted its role alongside tools like Claude Code and Codex in boosting research assistants’ workflows.
Agree. Bringing on more RAs, having them use AI tools & asking more ambitious questions & doing more ambitious work is the immediate future of science. Lots of what we do as academics is under strain, but for our core work, AI increases our reach, doesn’t replace smart RAs today. https://t.co/hv6MKkeyhV
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026
Automation & Orchestration
Omar Sar highlighted research on automatic harness synthesis for LLM agents, emphasizing how automating the scaffolding for tools, code execution, and APIs could lower barriers to agent development.
New survey on agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs.
LLM RL still treats models like sequence generators optimized in relatively narrow settings. However, real agents operate in open-ended, partially observable environments where planning, memory, tool use, reasoning,… pic.twitter.com/W5VnZm9lgl
— elvis (@omarsar0) March 7, 2026
Great read if you are engineering your own agent harness. https://t.co/rzE8H1ADrw
— elvis (@omarsar0) March 7, 2026
He also shared a survey on agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs, proposing a taxonomy for capabilities like planning, memory, and tool use in open-ended environments.
New survey on agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs.
LLM RL still treats models like sequence generators optimized in relatively narrow settings. However, real agents operate in open-ended, partially observable environments where planning, memory, tool use, reasoning,… pic.twitter.com/W5VnZm9lgl
— elvis (@omarsar0) March 7, 2026
Machina (@EXM7777) advocated building personal knowledge bases via note-taking (Notion, Obsidian) as persistent context for agents, turning SOPs and thinking into superior AI outputs.
building the habit of writing things down will very soon be a game changer when working with AI…
we all came to the same conclusion by now: the better the context you give, the better the output you get
that part isn't debatable anymore
if you're someone who writes down… pic.twitter.com/ZnLWrlpvxI
— Machina (@EXM7777) March 7, 2026
He also predicted “model consensus” as the future: multiple provider agents reasoning in parallel, merged by an orchestrator to highlight agreements/divergences, akin to Perplexity’s model council.
the future of AI is model consensus…
having multiple agents from different providers reason on your task, then an orchestrator merges everything and shows you exactly what they agreed on and where they diverged
Perplexity understood this early with the model council, and it's…
— Machina (@EXM7777) March 7, 2026
Strategy & Ecosystem
Javi Lopez (@javilopen) critiqued New York’s regulation mandating disclosure of AI models in advertisements starting June 9, 2026, with fines up to $5,000 per violation. He argued it unfairly targets AI compared to 3D VFX or mixed media, while malicious deepfakes are already covered by existing laws.
Let's make one thing clear: these IDIOTS are not regulating deepfakes used for malicious purposes or image rights, because all of that is ALREADY regulated.
These idiots are regulating the idea that if you use AI, you have to label it as "made with AI", but if you use 3D to do…
— Javi Lopez ⛩️ (@javilopen) March 7, 2026
Omar Sar discussed Yann LeCun’s research on Transformer phenomena like massive activations and attention sinks, attributing them to pre-norm architecture and their implications for quantization, pruning, and efficient inference.
New research from Yann LeCun and collaborators at NYU.
It's a really good read for anyone working on efficient Transformer inference.
The paper dissects two recurring phenomena in Transformer language models: massive activations (where a few tokens exhibit extreme outlier… pic.twitter.com/znwYUDUMU4
— elvis (@omarsar0) March 7, 2026
Simon Willison pointed out Qwen 3.5’s 4B model outperforming GPT-4o on benchmarks while running on iPhones, expressing suspicion of potential test-specific training.
Given the enormous size difference in terms of parameters this does make me suspicious that Qwen may have been training to the test on some of these
— Simon Willison (@simonw) March 7, 2026
You can run Qwen 3.5 on an iPhone via this app – the 4B model is a 3.06GB download https://t.co/bdKthxfBpp
— Simon Willison (@simonw) March 7, 2026
A.I. Warper sought recommendations for the best real-time text-to-speech solutions.
What is the best “realtime” text-2-speech solution today?
Paid or free but it needs to be near real time.
Admittedly an area I haven’t kept up with but now need it for something 🥲
— A.I.Warper (@AIWarper) March 7, 2026
Ethan Mollick (@emollick) emphasized AI’s transformative impact on science, enabling ambitious questions and RA upskilling with tools like Claude Code—shifting from replacement fears to expanded reach.
Agree. Bringing on more RAs, having them use AI tools & asking more ambitious questions & doing more ambitious work is the immediate future of science. Lots of what we do as academics is under strain, but for our core work, AI increases our reach, doesn’t replace smart RAs today. https://t.co/hv6MKkeyhV
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026
A case study of why I think that we overestimate the perfection level of our work prior to AI, and underestimate the degree to which AI may already be good enough at some critical tasks where it is not perfect. https://t.co/eb4VaWJwHN
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026
He critiqued persistent misinformation on outdated papers (e.g., 2025 hallucination study), noting rapid progress on benchmarks like SimpleBench.
Every damn day, another post with a thousand plus likes for a year old "breaking" paper that should "scare everyone using AI" because of issues with "latest top models" like Llama 4 and o3.
(The paper was good & multi-turn is hard, but, again, big progress since it was written.) https://t.co/aQpdENOQ2E pic.twitter.com/9d3rYisbJ5
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026
Amazing to see the two worst forms of AI posting in a QT. The original post misinterprets a highly-discussed paper from 2025 and calls it breaking news.
Than that is retweeted by someone else giving even more wrong info (from model performance to benchmark names). 1M views. Bleh pic.twitter.com/bRVGYSGG9m
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026
Pre-AI errors (e.g., Excel mangling gene names in 1/3 of top genetics papers) underscore how AI can already outperform imperfect human baselines.
A case study of why I think that we overestimate the perfection level of our work prior to AI, and underestimate the degree to which AI may already be good enough at some critical tasks where it is not perfect. https://t.co/eb4VaWJwHN
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) March 7, 2026